Internet Currency Forums are quite competitive. As with any business, watch out for backlash when badmouthing your competition. What goes around comes around, as the saying goes ...
February 13th, 2012
Badmouthing – Bad For Business?
Small businesses, thanks to basic human nature, tend to form communities. These are small, close-knit, and frequently very open in communication of anything that’s not directly advantageous to each other. This is true even for those that exist on the same level, competing against one another for the bigger market share of the market. So, to some small extent, it really isn’t all that surprising to learn that there are small companies out there that spend quite a bit of their marketing opportunities badmouthing the competition. This is rarely to the detriment of their promotions, of course, but it happens. The question is whether or not this sort of mentality actually puts them ahead, or if it just makes them look bad.
Like it or not, a business must accept that it will have competitors. This is a natural outcrop of the marketplace and something that no company can avoid. The business that spends most of its time badmouthing the competitors is going to find that it is giving itself a negative reputation.
They are akin to that kid in class that talks smack about everyone else behind their backs, but is in a position to allow him to avoid getting burned for his antics. Eventually, the other kids will stop talking to him either because they’re tired of what he’s doing or they’re afraid that he’ll expose negative traits they’d rather kept hidden. A small business might find itself being increasingly isolated from its community – and its customers – if it’s constantly bashing the competition.
Badmouthing people also tends to be used as a defense mechanism, highlighting someone else’s flaws because it hides their own weaknesses.
Read More Here
Sunday, February 12, 2012
Friday, December 23, 2011
Report on Ponzi Schemes
December 19, 2011
CNBC's Scott Cohn reports on more than $1.5B in losses as a result of Utah ponzi schemes.
Link ~ Utah: Welcome to Ponziland! - CNBC
CNBC's Scott Cohn reports on more than $1.5B in losses as a result of Utah ponzi schemes.
Link ~ Utah: Welcome to Ponziland! - CNBC
Thursday, December 8, 2011
Cyber attacks could wreck world oil supply
December 08, 2011
Cyber attacks could wreck world oil supply
Doha, Hackers are bombarding the world's computer controlled energy sector, conducting industrial espionage and threatening potential global havoc through oil supply disruption.
Oil company executives warned that attacks were becoming more frequent and more carefully planned.
"If anybody gets into the area where you can control opening and closing of valves, or release valves, you can imagine what happens," said Ludolf Luehmann, an IT manager at Shell Europe's biggest company .
"It will cost lives and it will cost production, it will cost money, cause fires and cause loss of containment, environmental damage - huge, huge damage," he told the World Petroleum Congress in Doha.
Continues @ read more ..
Cyber attacks could wreck world oil supply
Doha, Hackers are bombarding the world's computer controlled energy sector, conducting industrial espionage and threatening potential global havoc through oil supply disruption.
Oil company executives warned that attacks were becoming more frequent and more carefully planned.
"If anybody gets into the area where you can control opening and closing of valves, or release valves, you can imagine what happens," said Ludolf Luehmann, an IT manager at Shell Europe's biggest company .
"It will cost lives and it will cost production, it will cost money, cause fires and cause loss of containment, environmental damage - huge, huge damage," he told the World Petroleum Congress in Doha.
Continues @ read more ..
Thursday, December 1, 2011
Cyber Security Bill Approved by House Panel
December 1, 2011
Cyber Security bill approved by House panel
A bill to let U.S. spy agencies share intelligence on cyber threats with private companies was backed by a House of Representatives intelligence panel on Thursday.
In a 17-1 vote, the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence approved the legislation that would expand a pilot Pentagon program for sharing classified and sensitive threat information with defense contractors and their Internet service providers.
Under the measure, a longer list of companies would be eligible for access to classified data from the National Security Agency and other agencies.
The bill was amended to expand privacy protections for data that companies give the government, including, potentially, data that Internet providers give about their customers. That data could be used only for cyber or national security, according to the amendment.
Some critics have worried that this type of sharing arrangement amounts to government surveillance of private data.
The government would also be barred from searching collected data except to secure cyber networks from attack.
Cyber Security bill approved by House panel
A bill to let U.S. spy agencies share intelligence on cyber threats with private companies was backed by a House of Representatives intelligence panel on Thursday.
In a 17-1 vote, the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence approved the legislation that would expand a pilot Pentagon program for sharing classified and sensitive threat information with defense contractors and their Internet service providers.
Under the measure, a longer list of companies would be eligible for access to classified data from the National Security Agency and other agencies.
The bill was amended to expand privacy protections for data that companies give the government, including, potentially, data that Internet providers give about their customers. That data could be used only for cyber or national security, according to the amendment.
Some critics have worried that this type of sharing arrangement amounts to government surveillance of private data.
The government would also be barred from searching collected data except to secure cyber networks from attack.
Monday, November 28, 2011
Social Engineering and Financial Fraud Committed Over The Internet ~ What To Look For ...
Social engineering (security)
Social engineering is commonly understood to mean the art of manipulating, Psychological manipulation is a type of social influence that aims to change the perception or behavior of others through underhanded, deceptive, or even abusive tactics.
By advancing the interests of the manipulator, often at the other's expense, such methods could be considered exploitative, abusive, devious, and deceptive. people into performing actions or divulging confidential information.
The people who need to hide their crimes say it is similar to a confidence trick or simple fraud, the term typically applies to trickery or deception for the purpose of information gathering, fraud, or computer system access; in most cases the attacker never comes face-to-face with the global criminals/victims.
Accusers say "Social engineering" as an act of psychological manipulation was popularized by hacker-turned-consultant Kevin Mitnick. Global criminals name the term as associated with the social sciences, but its usage has caught on among computer professionals
Social engineering techniques and terms
All social engineering techniques are based on specific attributes of human decision-making known as cognitive biases. These biases, sometimes called "bugs in the human hardware," are exploited in various combinations to create attack techniques, some of which are listed here:
Pretexting
Pretexting is the act of creating and using an invented scenario (the pretext) to engage a targeted victim in a manner that increases the chance the victim will divulge information or perform actions that would be unlikely in ordinary circumstances.
Continues ..
Social engineering is commonly understood to mean the art of manipulating, Psychological manipulation is a type of social influence that aims to change the perception or behavior of others through underhanded, deceptive, or even abusive tactics.
By advancing the interests of the manipulator, often at the other's expense, such methods could be considered exploitative, abusive, devious, and deceptive. people into performing actions or divulging confidential information.
The people who need to hide their crimes say it is similar to a confidence trick or simple fraud, the term typically applies to trickery or deception for the purpose of information gathering, fraud, or computer system access; in most cases the attacker never comes face-to-face with the global criminals/victims.
Accusers say "Social engineering" as an act of psychological manipulation was popularized by hacker-turned-consultant Kevin Mitnick. Global criminals name the term as associated with the social sciences, but its usage has caught on among computer professionals
Social engineering techniques and terms
All social engineering techniques are based on specific attributes of human decision-making known as cognitive biases. These biases, sometimes called "bugs in the human hardware," are exploited in various combinations to create attack techniques, some of which are listed here:
Pretexting
Pretexting is the act of creating and using an invented scenario (the pretext) to engage a targeted victim in a manner that increases the chance the victim will divulge information or perform actions that would be unlikely in ordinary circumstances.
Continues ..
Who's Who ...
Iraqi dinar Money.com .. source for hundreds of dinar sites .. who are they? who owns them? Dinar Dealers .. A lucrative business .. find out more ... go to the Link
Also read .. Pharming – Redirecting website traffic to bogus sites
Sunday, November 27, 2011
Understanding Cyber Warfare. From Cyber Warfare to Cyber Resistance
November 27, 2011
Understanding Cyber Warfare. From Cyber Warfare to Cyber Resistance
Instruments of warfare have evolved. Gone are the days of battle-axes, machetes, swords, and men charging in strategic formation or lying in trenches awaiting their foe. Instead, guns, bombs, chemical and biological agents, unmanned aircraft and assault vehicles are used as instruments of war. A more significant change from the past has been the robotic nature of the way conflict is waged, supposedly making more “humane” an inhumane act.
The changes witnessed of course parallel technological advances within society, resulting in even more wars and conflicts being waged from behind a computer screen, in a command center, and by remote control. Likewise, the ways in which resistance is carried out will parallel the technological changes and evolving nature of warfare.
The rise of cyber warfare and resistance shed light on where we are heading, with both state and non-state actors on almost equal footing in the knowledge of and potential use for viruses, worms and Trojans. Arguably, some actors operating in the realm of cyber resistance are more advanced in knowledge than the states they are battling. Is Cyber Resistance a weapon for checking the traditional and conventional military power of the state? Will it be the key for checking Israel and its inhumane and disproportionate use of force and weaponry against Palestinians?
Continues ..
Understanding Cyber Warfare. From Cyber Warfare to Cyber Resistance
Instruments of warfare have evolved. Gone are the days of battle-axes, machetes, swords, and men charging in strategic formation or lying in trenches awaiting their foe. Instead, guns, bombs, chemical and biological agents, unmanned aircraft and assault vehicles are used as instruments of war. A more significant change from the past has been the robotic nature of the way conflict is waged, supposedly making more “humane” an inhumane act.
The changes witnessed of course parallel technological advances within society, resulting in even more wars and conflicts being waged from behind a computer screen, in a command center, and by remote control. Likewise, the ways in which resistance is carried out will parallel the technological changes and evolving nature of warfare.
The rise of cyber warfare and resistance shed light on where we are heading, with both state and non-state actors on almost equal footing in the knowledge of and potential use for viruses, worms and Trojans. Arguably, some actors operating in the realm of cyber resistance are more advanced in knowledge than the states they are battling. Is Cyber Resistance a weapon for checking the traditional and conventional military power of the state? Will it be the key for checking Israel and its inhumane and disproportionate use of force and weaponry against Palestinians?
Continues ..